- Home
- How We Score
How 280 Orders Turn Into a Trust Score
No rating on Safe Boosters comes out of a demo account or a press pass. We buy the boost the way you would, hand over an account we own, and then look at what that account has become a week and a month after the booster logs off. That record now covers 280 paid orders, each one tracked from the checkout page through to the final password change. The whole lineup goes back through the same process on a monthly cycle, and the most recent pass closed on June 22, 2026. No shop can buy a score, a position in the table, or the removal of an unflattering finding.
The Trust Score Model
Each service ends up with a Trust Score between 0 and 100, assembled from five weighted inputs. Those weights never shift between pages: a two-division Valorant order and a months-long WoW carry are measured on the same scale, and nobody gets a private version of the formula. Account handling takes 35 percent of the total because it covers the one kind of failure a refund cannot undo. A late order costs you a weekend. A password sitting in a support inbox, a booster queueing where your friends can see the account, a penalty stapled to a profile you have played for years - those stay with you long after the money comes back. The service that finishes as our lowest-risk pick gets there on exactly the same 35 percent as everyone below it.
| Input | Share of score | What we measure |
|---|---|---|
| How your account is handled | 35% | Whether the booster keeps your status dark so nobody on your friends list watches a stranger play, whether the session runs behind a region-locked VPN as standard or only after you ask twice, where your password lives while the order is open and whether anyone prompts you to change it afterwards, and whether the shop states the ToS risk in plain language instead of selling the job as risk-free. Once delivery is done we read the login history ourselves and note anything the account was signed into that we did not order. |
| Delivery and pace | 25% | Did the order we paid for actually finish, did it land by the date on the confirmation, and did a booster sit down at the account when the shop promised one would. We time the gap between payment and first game, count mid-order pauses and handovers to a second player, and hold the rank on the account at the end against the rank printed on the receipt. Quietly shrinking the job and calling it complete is scored here, however politely support explains it. |
| Honest pricing | 15% | The figure on the checkout page against the figure in the advert, re-checked through recurring sweeps across ranks, regions and add-ons. We flag charges that surface only at the payment step, currency padding, extras switched on by default, and quote-only pricing that drifts once you are in a chat window. Refund conditions have to exist in writing before they earn anything; a promise typed by an agent is worth nothing on the day you need to lean on it. |
| Verified reviews | 15% | Feedback we can tie to a purchase that demonstrably happened, weighted well above anonymous star drops. We strip out coordinated posting from both directions, the bulk five-star weekends and the rival smear runs, then read how the shop answers a customer who is genuinely angry. A single loud incident that got resolved troubles us less than the same small complaint surfacing month after month. |
| Quality of support | 10% | Speed and competence on tickets we open during live orders, plus one deliberately inconvenient request per service: a schedule change halfway through, a partial refund question, a demand to swap the booster. Canned replies that answer a neighbouring question lose points, and so does a chat widget staffed generously while you are choosing and thinly once you have paid. |
The Four Tiers
A finished score lands in one of four bands: Excellent from 90 upwards, Good from 75, Fair from 60, and Poor for anything that settles below 60.
What We Measure Ourselves
- Sorting genuine feedback. Public reviews get audited before they touch a number. We look for bursts, thirty entries inside two days after months of silence, for the same sentence architecture appearing under a dozen different names, and for accounts whose entire posting history is one glowing paragraph about one company. Complaints get the slower read: whether the shop replied, whether the same fault came back later, and whether the story even fits the way that service takes orders in the first place.
- Claiming a refund. Refund terms cost nothing to publish and plenty to honour, so on at least one paid order per service we file a claim for real - a cancellation partway through, a stalled job, a result that missed what was sold. We record who picks it up, how long the money takes to arrive, and how much of it does. A policy page that survives contact with an actual claim earns its quote in the review; one that folds gets scored on what happened, not on what it promised.
- Who played it. Shops advertise Immortal and Grandmaster rosters, and we check that against the ladder. Where a game exposes match history we pull the games played on our account during the order window and set them beside the profile we were handed: rank, region, hours, the shape of the play itself. A booster three tiers below the marketing, or a session running from a country nobody mentioned at checkout, ends up in the same paragraph of the write-up.
Our Independence
Placement here has no price, because there is nothing to sell. Every order behind these ratings comes out of our own budget, and being covered costs a service nothing either way. Three rules hold that line:
- Test orders go in anonymously and on our own money: no comped boosts, no review copies, no heads-up to the shop that the buyer waiting in the queue writes for this site.
- One process, one set of weights, run on the shop we expect to like and the shop we expect to dislike in the same week and the same order.
- Nobody sees their Trust Score, their tier or their write-up before the page goes live; a service reads its verdict the same morning you do.
Tell Us What Is Wrong
Prices move, shops change hands, and a single order can catch a decent service on a bad week, so some of what sits on this site will age badly. If a page does not match what you have seen for yourself, write to errata@safeboosters.net, quote the page and tell us what looks wrong. Anything you send gets held against the order logs and price records from that run before we change a word.
Who Does This Work
Ryan Whitfield is the Account Safety Lead at Safe Boosters and works as an account-security consultant away from it, which is where the habits on this site came from: read the login history, ask who held the credentials, assume nothing about what happened while the account was out of its owner's hands. He funds and places all 280 test orders himself, keeps the running log of how each shop handles VPN routing and offline play, and returns to those same accounts weeks after delivery to see whether anything landed on them - a warning, a rank rollback, a login from a city nobody mentioned. The monthly re-audit that keeps this table current is his as well.